Jump to content

Jimmy Yacabonis (Formerly Means and Yacabonis)


Frobby

Recommended Posts

o

 

If you would please excuse me for borrowing the main board, but one of our Advanced-A pitchers did something tonight that I have never seen (or heard of) done at any level of professional baseball.

John Means (Advanced-A Frederick Keys) walked a batter in the 1st inning, and then proceeded to throw 42 strikes in 43 pitches the rest of the game ....... in which he recorded 20 outs in 6 innings (he had to record 2 additional outs because of 2 dropped 3rd strikes.) :eektf:

Throwing 42 out of 43 pitches for strikes in and of itself is incredible ...... but to get that many outs (20) in the process seems to me like a once-in-a-lifetime thing to witness/read about.

 

20 OUTS: 10 Strikeouts, 3 Popouts, 3 Lineouts, 2 Groundouts, 1 Flyout, 1 Caught Stealing *

JOHN ALAN MEANS ))) (vs. Advanced-A Potomac, 5/05)

IP:l 6

H:;; 5 l) (2 Doubles, 3 Singles)

R:l) 2

BB: 1

SO: 10

Pitches: 50 (45 Strikes, 5 Balls)

2016 ERA: 2.32 l(Advanced-A Frederick)

* )) Means recorded 2 additional outs due to the fact that 2 Runners Reached Safely on Dropped 3rd Strikes

 

PITCHES BY INNING

**********************

81 (41 Strikes, 4 Balls)

91 (91 Strikes, 0 Balls)

51 (51 Strikes, 0 Balls)

11 (11 Strikes, 0 Balls) **

71 (71 Strikes, 0 Balls)

10 (91 Strikes, 1 Balls) ***

** )) Means recorded 4 outs in the 4th inning due to a dropped 3rd strike.

*** )) Means recorded 4 outs in the 6th inning due to a dropped 3rd strike.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the Minor League archives even kept in this much detail in order to keep up with such a display of pinpoint control? I know there's a Gameday kind of display for MiLB, but I don't know if that's then put into some kind of archive or database. I'm far from an archives expert (though that's my wife's profession at the university) so I don't know. I agree, it sounds like a rare accomplishment. I've heard of consecutive strike outs being documented simply by anyone keeping score and paying attention, but this almost sounds impossible.

Bravo.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by NashLumber
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the Minor League archives even kept in this much detail in order to keep up with such a display of pinpoint control? I know there's a Gameday kind of display for MiLB, but I don't know if that's then put into some kind of archive or database. I'm not much of a data / archives buff (though that's my wife's profession at the university) so I don't know. I agree, it sounds like a rare accomplishment. I've heard of consecutive strike outs being documented simply by anyone keeping score and paying attention, but this almost sounds impossible.

Bravo.

Yes, they are.

They used to do it for mostly AAA and AA games, but but now they are doing it for Advanced-A and Regular A games, also.

Believe it or not, the Minor League box scores actually have more detail than do Major League box scores, because you can actually see each and every pitch that is thrown, each and every inning.

At the Major League level, you cannot get the pitches-per inning ...... unless I keep track of it each inning as the game progresses, and post here on the OH. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, I had started a thread on Means last night on the MiL board, and I am usually very annoyed when threads on minor leaguers appear on the main board, since it detracts from the purpose of having separate forums and causes a lot of redundancy. But in this case, if Means truly did throw 42 strikes in 43 pitches while striking out 10 in the process, then I do think that's such a rare (unprecedented?) feat that it warrants being posted here.

However, having looked at the box score, it's quite obvious that the pitch counts are not accurate. Look at all the pitch counts and strike totals for all the pitchers in the game: http://m.milb.com/t493/2016_05_05_frdafa_potafa_1. The opposing starter supposedly throw 38 pitches, 34 for strikes, in 7 innings. Not buying it.

I'd also have to wonder why they pulled Means from the game after throwing only 50 pitches in 6 innings. The official game story makes no mention of any amazing run of consecutive strikes, either. So I'm convinced this box score is in error. False alarm!

Edited by Frobby
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing what Frobby pointed out about the opposing pitcher, I am disappointed that apparently there may have been something wrong with Gameday ....... especially since (as I previously stated) that all of the games that I have ever listened to did indeed correspond precisely to Gameday's count.

Yes, that's very annoying. Gameday does something similar in major league spring training games -- all strikeouts are recorded as three pitches, all walks count as four pitches, every other batter counts as one pitch. I think that's where the numbers in yesterday's Keys box score come from.

Means

10 strikeouts = 30 pitches

1 walk = 4 pitches

9 other outs by hitters = 9 pitches

5 hits = 5 pitches

2 runners reaching on wild pitches = 2 pitches

Total = 50 pitches

Whiting

4 strikeouts = 12 pitches

1 walk = 4 pitches

17 other outs = 17 pitches

5 hits = 5 pitches

Total = 38 pitches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">John Means is through five scoreless frames. Due up for Frederick: Kneeland, Salcedo, and Gonzalez. Listen at <a href="https://twitter.com/SourceRadioNetw">@SourceRadioNetw</a>.</p>— Frederick Keys (@FrederickKeys) <a href="

">May 12, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Means has ceded 2 earned runs in his last 21 innings pitched.

He has ceded 0 earned runs in 2 out of his last 3 games.

18 OUTS: 6 Strikeouts, 6 Groundouts, 4 Flyouts, 2 Caught Stealing

JOHN ALAN MEANS O (vs. Advanced-A Wilmington, 5/11)

IP:l 6

H:;; 6 l(1 Double, 5 Singles)

R:l) 0

BB: 1

SO: 6

Pitches: 92 (58 Strikes, 34 Balls)

2016 ERA: 1.95 l(Advanced-A Frederick)

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

26 (17 Strikes, 9 Balls)

13 (81 Strikes, 5 Balls)

61 (41 Strikes, 2 Balls)

19 (11 Strikes, 8 Balls)

11 (71 Strikes, 4 Balls)

17 (11 Strikes, 6 Balls)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

Means started the 7th inning by getting a routine fly ball ...... which the rightfielder simply lost.

The next batter hit a double, and he exited the game.

Hence, he had a better game than his overall numbers indicate.

18 OUTS: 8 Strikeouts, 5 Flyouts, 3 Groundouts, 1 Popout, 1 Lineout

JOHN ALAN MEANS O (vs. Advanced-A Myrtle Beach, 5/16)

IP:l 6 - PLUS

H:;; 6 l(3 Doubles, 3 Singles)

R:l) 2

BB: 1

SO: 8

Pitches: 91 (60 Strikes, 31 Balls)

2016 ERA: 2.09 l(Advanced-A Frederick)

PITCHES BY INNING

****************

21 (14 Strikes, 7 Balls)

12 (81 Strikes, 4 Balls)

81 (51 Strikes, 3 Balls)

14 (10 Strikes, 4 Balls)

12 (91 Strikes, 3 Balls)

20 (12 Strikes, 8 Balls)

41 (21 Strikes, 2 Balls) *

* Means did not record any outs before departing in the 7th inning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game tonight and came away impressed with Means pitch sequencing. He had an 88-91 MPH fastball, and 81-83 MPH changeup, and a 71-73 MPH curveball. He wasn't afraid to throw any one of those pitches in any count and pitched backwards to several hitters. I liked his tempo on the mound and his strike throwing ability. I don't know how his stuff will play at higher levels but it was clear to me that he knows how to command his three pitch mix.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was at the game tonight and came away impressed with Means pitch sequencing. He had an 88-91 MPH fastball, and 81-83 MPH changeup, and a 71-73 MPH curveball. He wasn't afraid to throw any one of those pitches in any count and pitched backwards to several hitters. I liked his tempo on the mound and his strike throwing ability. I don't know how his stuff will play at higher levels but it was clear to me that he knows how to command his three pitch mix.

Thanks. Always appreciate your inputs. I'm not anywhere near the evaluator that some of you on this board are, but it must be very difficult to project RH pitchers whose fastballs sit ~90mph, no matter how good the rest of their stuff is.

I hope for this guy like I hope for every Orioles prospect. He just seems like a guy that will simply have to prove it at every level. If he does, we will all celebrate. If he doesn't, I would be less disappointed than if, say, Hunter Harvey or Dylan Bundy or now Chris Lee doesn't make it.

It's just so much easier to project (and I mean in a fan's hopefull way) high velocity stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Many ways up the mountain and there are plenty of other relievers who put up similar numbers and would command far less. If you look at production, Danny Coulumbe is having a similar year for us. Finnegan is alright, Yates is good, Clase, Robertson, there are a few guys that deliver similar results without the flash of 103 and there are also diamonds in the rough like Danny or like Suarez that can give you the same level but without the flash. I trust our scouts to find those guys as they have time and time again.
    • Closer by committee or not, the issue with the pen is that you need a guy with superb strikeout numbers to tilt the odds in extras with the ghost runner.  That is one of the hidden values in a guy like Bautista that gave us such a competitive advantage in 1 run games (in particular in extra innings). That and he could go for more than 3 outs (like he did 9 times last year). Luckily our team is better this year so we are not as reliant on winning close games. However, the day will come (in the postseason) where we will need to win a “battle of the bullpens” type of game. Right now I don’t like our odds in that scenario (especially if we were facing a team like the Yankees).
    • Again, it doesn’t matter who is on the other side of this equation. The question is, what do you do with Urias?  The other part is easy. 
    • He’s aging so badly?  What an awful take. He has had a bad 55 at bats this year.  What other evidence do you have that he is “aging badly”? He had an OpS over 700 for the second half and it was in the mid 700s in September of last year, with a really strong OBP. So, it’s not like he was garbage for most of last year heading into the offseason and is continuing to struggle.  This is just a SSS of awful production.
    • Agreed the whole he is getting old argument is not even an argument.  Did he just get old the last two weeks?  He was by far our best reliever the first 4 weeks of the season.  He had pitched 11 innings gave up 5 hits and  walked 2 with 7 saves.  Then the struggles came and the back injury which most likely made him change something in his mechanics even if he isn't still hurt sometimes you get in bad habits trying to keep away from the pain.  It is more mental then physical at that point.  
    • Yep..which is why I’m very hesitant to trade HK for him.    Hell, it wouldn’t shock me if he didn’t even make it through this season. If I  were the Os, I would be offering something like Norby, Stowers and solid lower level lottery ticket like Mordan.  That’s a solid return for a reliever, regardless of how talented he is. 2 everyday guys with solid upside and a potential long term answer at C.
    • What makes Norby better than Mayo? And what is Norby’s place on this team next year even? With all the talent on the team currently and all the better/more talented INF in the Minors in front of him, I don’t see a regular place in the lineup going into the future. He will serve a much better purpose in being included in a trade IMO than to start his clock now.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...